## Abstract Since pervaporation performance of ethanol‐permselective silicalite membrane, which is an aluminum‐free hydrophobic zeolite, in the separation of fermentation broths by yeast are negatively affected by succinic acid, the potential of pervaporation using silicone rubber‐coated silicalite
Processing of ethanol fermentation broths by Candida krusei to separate bioethanol by pervaporation using silicone rubber-coated silicalite membranes
✍ Scribed by Toru Ikegami; Tomotake Morita; Shunichi Nakayama; Hideyuki Negishi; Dai Kitamoto; Keiji Sakaki; Yasunori Oumi; Tsuneji Sano; Kenji Haraya; Hiroshi Yanagishita
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 204 KB
- Volume
- 84
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0268-2575
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pervaporation employing ethanol‐permselective silicalite membranes as an alternative to distillation is a promising approach for refining low‐concentration bioethanol solutions. However, to make the separation process practicable, it is extremely important to avoid the problems caused by the adsorption of succinate on the membrane during the separation process. In this work, the pervaporation of an ethanol fermentation broth without succinate was investigated, as well as the influence of several fermentation broth nutrient components.
RESULTS: Candida krusei IA‐1 produces an extremely low level of succinate. The decrease in permeate ethanol concentration through a silicone rubber‐coated silicalite membrane during the separation of low‐succinate C. krusei IA‐1 fermentation broth was significantly improved when compared with that obtained using Saccharomyces cerevisiae broth. By treating the fermentation broth with activated carbon, bioethanol was concentrated as efficiently as with binary mixtures of ethanol/water. The total flux was improved upto 56% of that obtained from the separation of binary mixtures, compared with 43% before the addition of activated carbon. Nutrients such as peptone, yeast extract and corn steep liquor had a negative effect on pervaporation, but this response was distinct from that caused by succinate.
CONCLUSION: For consistent separation of bioethanol from C. krusei IA‐1 fermentation broth by pervaporation, it is useful to treat the low nutrient broth with activated carbon. To further improve pervaporation performance, it will be necessary to suppress the accumulation of glycerol. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract **BACKGROUND:** To use butanol as a liquid fuel and feedstock, it is necessary to establish processes for refining low‐concentration butanol solutions. Pervaporation (PV) employing hydrophobic silicalite membranes for selective recovery of butanol is a promising approach. In this study,
## Abstract For the production of highly concentrated bioethanol by pervaporation using an ethanol‐permselective silicalite membrane, pervaporation performance was investigated using a silicalite membrane entirely covered with a silicone rubber sheet to prevent direct contact with acidic compounds.