๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Second malignancies in prostate carcinoma patients after radiotherapy compared with surgery

โœ Scribed by David J. Brenner; Rochelle E. Curtis; Eric J. Hall; Elaine Ron


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
115 KB
Volume
88
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


BACKGROUND.

In the treatment of prostate carcinoma, radiotherapy and surgery are common choices of comparable efficacy; thus a realistic comparison of the potential long term sequelae, such as the risk of second malignancy, may be of relevance to treatment choice.

METHODS.

Data regarding the rate of incidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program cancer registry (1973-1993) were used to compare directly second malignancy risks in 51,584 men with prostate carcinoma who received radiotherapy (3549 of whom developed second malignancies) with 70,539 men who underwent surgery without radiotherapy (5055 of whom developed second malignancies). Data were stratified by latency period, age at diagnosis, and site of the second malignancy. Directly comparing the risks in the radiotherapy group with those in the surgery group largely avoids problems associated with underreporting second malignancies.

RESULTS.

Radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma was associated with a small, statistically significant increase in the risk of solid tumors (6%; P ฯญ 0.02) relative to treatment with surgery. Among patients who survived for ี† 5 years, the increased relative risk reached 15%, and was 34% for patients surviving ี† 10 years. The most significant contributors to the increased risk in the irradiated group were carcinomas of the bladder, rectum, and lung, and sarcomas within the treatment field. No significant increase in rates of leukemia was noted.

CONCLUSIONS.

Radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma was associated with a statistically significant, although fairly small, enhancement in the risk of second solid tumors, particularly for long term survivors. The pattern of excess second malignancies among men treated with radiotherapy was consistent with radiobiologic principles in terms of site, dose, and latency. In absolute terms, the estimated risk of developing a radiation-associated second malignancy was 1 in 290 for all prostate carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy, increasing to 1 in 70 for long term survivors (ี† 10 years). Improvements in radiotherapeutic techniques, along with diagnosis at younger ages and earlier stages, are resulting in longer survival times for patients with prostate carcinoma. Because of the long latency period for radiation-induced tumors, this may result in radiation-related second malignancy risk becoming a more significant issue.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The quality of swallowing for patients w
โœ Rajendra A. Badwe; Vinay Sharma; Mehul S. Bhansali; Ketayun A. Dinshaw; Prakash ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 84 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Background: Surgery is considered the standard treatment for operable esophageal carcinoma, although there is no compelling evidence that surgery can achieve better results than radiotherapy. there has previously been no direct randomized comparison of these two modalities with survival or disea

Evaluation of radiation effect, tumor di
โœ Juanita M. Crook; Yasir A. Bahadur; Susan J. Robertson; Gad A. Perry; Bernd A. E ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 249 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

tients with residual tumor in 1 or more biopsies at 10 -78 months of follow-up Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canwere selected for review. All patients had undergone biopsy on more than one ada. occasion. The 198 biopsies were stained for PSA, high molecular weight keratin,