✦ LIBER ✦

SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER IS NEITHER APPROPRIATE NOR COST-EFFECTIVE

✍ Scribed by Albertsen, Peter C.

Book ID: 122886801
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1996
Tongue: English
Weight: 869 KB
Volume: 23
Category: Article
ISSN: 0094-0143
DOI: 10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70332-3

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Is screening for breast cancer cost-effe

Is screening for breast cancer cost-effective?

✍ Alvin I. Mushlin; Lou Fintor 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 576 KB

Is mass screening for breast cancer cost

Is mass screening for breast cancer cost-effective?

✍ HJ. de Koning Contra; J.W.W.Coebergh Arbiter; J.A. van Dongen 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 727 KB

Is mass screening for breast cancer cost

Is mass screening for breast cancer cost-effective?

✍ J.W.W. Coebergh 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 709 KB

Is mass screening for breast cancer cost

Is mass screening for breast cancer cost-effective?

✍ J.A. van Dongen 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 209 KB

Microsatellite screening for hereditary

Microsatellite screening for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is cost-effective

✍ Gabriela Moeslein 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 58 KB

Faecal occult blood screening for colore

Faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer: is it cost-effective?

✍ David K. Whynes; Aileen R. Neilson; Andrew R. Walker; Jack D. Hardcastle 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 105 KB 👁 2 views

Recently published evidence from two large-scale clinical trials conducted in England and in Denmark suggests that faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer significantly reduces mortality. However, before screening can be advocated as part of national health policy, its cost-effectiveness