𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Screening for Prostate Cancer. Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound, Prostate Specific Antigen and Rectal Examination

✍ Scribed by P. PERRIN; J. H. MAQUET; G. BRINGEON; M. DEVONEC


Book ID
115196504
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Weight
229 KB
Volume
68
Category
Article
ISSN
1464-4096

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Prostate-specific antigen, digital recta
✍ Dr. Joseph R. Drago; Jeffrey P. York πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1992 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 331 KB

Over a 4% year period, 1,940 asymptomatic men were entered in a prostate cancer detection program consisting of digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and transrectal prostate ultrasound (TRUS). Four hundred and sixteen biopsies were performed resulting in the diagnosis o

The role of digital rectal examination,
✍ Fred Lee; Peter J. Littrup πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1992 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 389 KB

In a study population, can digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and prostate specific antigen (PSA) (monoclonal) effectively detect the majority of clinically relevant cancer? If this is possible, the remaining patients could then be considered for chemopreventive protoco

Evaluation of prostatic specific antigen
✍ Bernard Candas; Lionel Cusan; Jose-Luis Gomez; Pierre Diamond; Raul E. Suburu; J πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 341 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## BACKGROUND. The 11,811 first visits and 46,751 annual follow-up visits performed since 1988 were analyzed in order to assess the efficacy of serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) for diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODS. At first visit, screening included