𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasound in predicting the probability of cancer

✍ Scribed by Dr. Joseph R. Drago; Jeffrey P. York


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
331 KB
Volume
49
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-4790

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Over a 4% year period, 1,940 asymptomatic men were entered in a prostate cancer detection program consisting of digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and transrectal prostate ultrasound (TRUS). Four hundred and sixteen biopsies were performed resulting in the diagnosis of 79 cancers; 82% had clinically organ confined tumors. A recommendation for biopsy was made in 260 (62%) based on the TRUS alone, 55 (1 3%) by DRE alone, 92 (22%) when the DRE and TRUS were both abnormal, and in 9 (2.2%) cases when only PSA levels were elevated. The DRE, PSA, and TRUS were abnormal in 1,261 (65%), 989 (51%), and 1,552 (80%) of the patients with cancer, respectively. Prostate cancer detection increased as the serum PSA level increased above 4 ng/ml. The positive predictive value of both DRE and TRUS were significantly influenced by an elevated PSA, ( P = .042 and P < .00005, respectively). The results of this study support the idea that, although the prostate cancer detection rate is influenced by these three modalities and the detection rate of localized disease can be improved by early detection programs, its effect on mortality rates remains undefined at this time.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The role of digital rectal examination,
✍ Fred Lee; Peter J. Littrup πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1992 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 389 KB

In a study population, can digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and prostate specific antigen (PSA) (monoclonal) effectively detect the majority of clinically relevant cancer? If this is possible, the remaining patients could then be considered for chemopreventive protoco

Evaluation of prostatic specific antigen
✍ Bernard Candas; Lionel Cusan; Jose-Luis Gomez; Pierre Diamond; Raul E. Suburu; J πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 341 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## BACKGROUND. The 11,811 first visits and 46,751 annual follow-up visits performed since 1988 were analyzed in order to assess the efficacy of serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) for diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODS. At first visit, screening included

Algorithms based on prostate-specific an
✍ Patrik Finne; Ralf Finne; Chris Bangma; Jonas Hugosson; Matti Hakama; Anssi Auvi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 105 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Our objective was to determine whether multivariate algorithms based on serum total PSA, the free proportion of PSA, age, digital rectal examination and prostate volume can reduce the rate of false‐positive PSA results in prostate cancer screening more effectively than the proportion of

Efficiency of prostate-specific antigen
✍ Crawford, E. David; Leewansangtong, Sunai; Goktas, Serdar; Holthaus, Kerri; Baie πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 117 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic efficiency of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) testing when using either 4.0 ng/ml or an age-specific reference range (ASRR) as an abnormal cutoff PSA value. METHODS. Between 1992Between -1995, 116, 116,073 m