✦ LIBER ✦

Screening for lung cancer re-examined: A reinterpretation of the Mayo Lung Project randomized trial on lung cancer screening

Book ID: 122937088
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1994
Tongue: English
Weight: 160 KB
Volume: 10
Category: Article
ISSN: 0169-5002
DOI: 10.1016/0169-5002(94)90750-1

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Screening for lung cancer: The Mayo lung

Screening for lung cancer: The Mayo lung project revisited

✍ Betty J. Flehinger; Marek Kimmel; Tatyana Polyak; Myron R. Melamed 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 704 KB

Screening for lung cancer. A critique of

Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the mayo lung project

✍ Robert S. Fontana; David R. Sanderson; Lewis B. Woolner; William F. Taylor; W. E 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 925 KB

Screening for lung cancer. A critique of

Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the Mayo Lung Project

📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 161 KB

Chest X-ray screening improves outcome i

Chest X-ray screening improves outcome in lung cancer: A reappraisal of randomized trials on lung cancer screening

📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 245 KB

Estimating sample size for a randomized

Estimating sample size for a randomized clinical trial of lung cancer screening

✍ Nancy A. Obuchowski 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 210 KB

Randomized population trials and screeni

Randomized population trials and screening for lung cancer : Breaking the cure barrier

✍ Gary M. Strauss 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 212 KB 👁 2 views

## BACKGROUND. At the current time, there is nearly universal agreement that screening for the early detection of lung carcinoma is not justified. This is based on the fact that, to the author's knowledge, no randomized population trial (RPT) to date has demonstrated a significant reduction in lun