✦ LIBER ✦

Screening for lung cancer: The Mayo lung project revisited

✍ Scribed by Betty J. Flehinger; Marek Kimmel; Tatyana Polyak; Myron R. Melamed

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1993
Tongue: English
Weight: 704 KB
Volume: 72
Category: Article
ISSN: 0008-543X
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930901)72:5<1573::aid-cncr2820720514>3.0.co;2-9

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Screening for lung cancer. A critique of

Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the mayo lung project

✍ Robert S. Fontana; David R. Sanderson; Lewis B. Woolner; William F. Taylor; W. E 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 925 KB

Modeling excess lung cancer risk among s

Modeling excess lung cancer risk among screened arm participants in the Mayo Lung Project

✍ Deborah L. Goldwasser; Marek Kimmel 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 185 KB

The Mayo Lung Project : A perspective

✍ Robert S. Fontana 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 112 KB 👁 2 views

Screening for lung cancer

✍ Edward J. Beattie; James C. Harvey 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 202 KB

Lung scanning as a screening method for

Lung scanning as a screening method for cancer of the lung

✍ H. Ernst; J. Krüger; K. Vessal 📂 Article 📅 1969 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 887 KB

After injection of 131I-MAA (macro-aggregated human serum albumin), the authors obtained pulmonary scans from 500 patients with various pulmonary diseases. The results of scanning and of standard roentgenographic examination are compared on the basis of 138 cases with definitely diagnosed malignant

Pathologic review of the Mayo Lung Proje

Pathologic review of the Mayo Lung Project : Is there a case for misdiagnosis or overdiagnosis of lung carcinoma in the screened group?

✍ Thomas V. Colby; Henry D. Tazelaar; William D. Travis; Erik J. Bergstralh; James 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 71 KB 👁 1 views

## Background: In the mayo lung project screening trial, there were more carcinomas identified in the screened group compared with the control group. the screened group had better survival, but there was no difference in lung carcinoma mortality between the screened group and the control group. the