𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Scoring optimisation of unbound protein–protein docking including protein binding site predictions

✍ Scribed by Sebastian Schneider; Martin Zacharias


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
634 KB
Volume
25
Category
Article
ISSN
0952-3499

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The prediction of the structure of the protein–protein complex is of great importance to better understand molecular recognition processes. During systematic protein–protein docking, the surface of a protein molecule is scanned for putative binding sites of a partner protein. The possibility to include external data based on either experiments or bioinformatic predictions on putative binding sites during docking has been systematically explored. The external data were included during docking with a coarse‐grained protein model and on the basis of force field weights to bias the docking search towards a predicted or known binding region. The approach was tested on a large set of protein partners in unbound conformations. The significant improvement of the docking performance was found if reliable data on the native binding sites were available. This was possible even if data for single key amino acids at a binding interface are included. In case of binding site predictions with limited accuracy, only modest improvement compared with unbiased docking was found. The optimisation of the protocol to bias the search towards predicted binding sites was found to further improve the docking performance resulting in approximately 40% acceptable solutions within the top 10 docking predictions compared with 22% in case of unbiased docking of unbound protein structures. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Role of binding entropy in the refinemen
✍ Anatoly M. Ruvinsky 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 174 KB

## Abstract We present results of testing the ability of eleven popular scoring functions to predict native docked positions using a recently developed method (Ruvinsky and Kozintsev, J Comput Chem 2005, 26, 1089) for estimation the entropy contributions of relative motions to protein‐ligand bindin

Multiple ligand simultaneous docking: Or
✍ Huameng Li; Chenglong Li 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 535 KB

## Abstract Present docking methodologies simulate only one single ligand at a time during docking process. In reality, the molecular recognition process always involves multiple molecular species. Typical protein–ligand interactions are, for example, substrate and cofactor in catalytic cycle; meta

Statistical analysis of computational do
✍ Godden, Jeffrey W.; Stahura, Florence L.; Bajorath, J�rgen 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 361 KB

The results of 16 docking simulations with rigid receptor sites Ž . and flexible ligands ; 60,000 compounds in each case are statistically analyzed and compared. Different combinations of binding sites, scoring functions, and compound collections are used in these calculations. The docking scores ar