Scoring optimisation of unbound protein–protein docking including protein binding site predictions
✍ Scribed by Sebastian Schneider; Martin Zacharias
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 634 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0952-3499
- DOI
- 10.1002/jmr.1165
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The prediction of the structure of the protein–protein complex is of great importance to better understand molecular recognition processes. During systematic protein–protein docking, the surface of a protein molecule is scanned for putative binding sites of a partner protein. The possibility to include external data based on either experiments or bioinformatic predictions on putative binding sites during docking has been systematically explored. The external data were included during docking with a coarse‐grained protein model and on the basis of force field weights to bias the docking search towards a predicted or known binding region. The approach was tested on a large set of protein partners in unbound conformations. The significant improvement of the docking performance was found if reliable data on the native binding sites were available. This was possible even if data for single key amino acids at a binding interface are included. In case of binding site predictions with limited accuracy, only modest improvement compared with unbiased docking was found. The optimisation of the protocol to bias the search towards predicted binding sites was found to further improve the docking performance resulting in approximately 40% acceptable solutions within the top 10 docking predictions compared with 22% in case of unbiased docking of unbound protein structures. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract We present results of testing the ability of eleven popular scoring functions to predict native docked positions using a recently developed method (Ruvinsky and Kozintsev, J Comput Chem 2005, 26, 1089) for estimation the entropy contributions of relative motions to protein‐ligand bindin
## Abstract Present docking methodologies simulate only one single ligand at a time during docking process. In reality, the molecular recognition process always involves multiple molecular species. Typical protein–ligand interactions are, for example, substrate and cofactor in catalytic cycle; meta
The results of 16 docking simulations with rigid receptor sites Ž . and flexible ligands ; 60,000 compounds in each case are statistically analyzed and compared. Different combinations of binding sites, scoring functions, and compound collections are used in these calculations. The docking scores ar