## Abstract Electronic polarizability, an important physical property of biomolecules, is currently ignored in most biomolecular calculations. Yet, it is widely believed that polarization could account for a substantial fraction of the total nonbonded energy of a system. This belief is supported by
Multiple ligand simultaneous docking: Orchestrated dancing of ligands in binding sites of protein
✍ Scribed by Huameng Li; Chenglong Li
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 535 KB
- Volume
- 31
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0192-8651
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Present docking methodologies simulate only one single ligand at a time during docking process. In reality, the molecular recognition process always involves multiple molecular species. Typical protein–ligand interactions are, for example, substrate and cofactor in catalytic cycle; metal ion coordination together with ligand(s); and ligand binding with water molecules. To simulate the real molecular binding processes, we propose a novel multiple ligand simultaneous docking (MLSD) strategy, which can deal with all the above processes, vastly improving docking sampling and binding free energy scoring. The work also compares two search strategies: Lamarckian genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization, which have respective advantages depending on the specific systems. The methodology proves robust through systematic testing against several diverse model systems: E. coli purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP) complex with two substrates, SHP2NSH2 complex with two peptides and Bcl‐xL complex with ABT‐737 fragments. In all cases, the final correct docking poses and relative binding free energies were obtained. In PNP case, the simulations also capture the binding intermediates and reveal the binding dynamics during the recognition processes, which are consistent with the proposed enzymatic mechanism. In the other two cases, conventional single‐ligand docking fails due to energetic and dynamic coupling among ligands, whereas MLSD results in the correct binding modes. These three cases also represent potential applications in the areas of exploring enzymatic mechanism, interpreting noisy X‐ray crystallographic maps, and aiding fragment‐based drug design, respectively. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2010
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Solvent dipole ordering (SDO), introduced by Higo et al. (Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2000, 40, 193), is an entity that captures an aspect of hydration structure. We have studied SDO in the ligand binding site of two proteins (FK506 binding protein and dihydrofolate reductase) and found
## Abstract Modern structure‐based drug design aims at accounting for the intrinsic flexibility of therapeutic relevant targets. Over the last few years a considerable amount of docking approaches that encounter this challenging problem has emerged. Here we provide the readership with an overview o