## Abstract Clinical reasoning has traditionally been understood in terms of either hypotheticoβdeductive or Bayesian methods. However, clinical psychology requires an organizing framework that goes beyond the limits of these methods and characterizes the full range of reasoning processes involved
Scientific method, abduction, and clinical reasoning
β Scribed by Brian D. Haig
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 88 KB
- Volume
- 64
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9762
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
This special issue of the Journal of Clinical Psychology comprises six theoretical papers that are concerned with the interconnected topics of scientific method, abductive inference, and clinical reasoning. The first four papers deal with the nature and limitations of a broad abductive theory of scientific method, and its application to clinical reasoning and case formulation. These are followed by three papers which in turn consider the prospects of using explanatory criteria to appraise competing models of psychopathy, examine the merits of a number of different psychometric perspectives on the assessment of psychopathology, and reject a core supposition of the orthodox approach to hypothesis testing. Β© 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 64: 1β6, 2008.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The articles in this issue all focus, in one way on another, on how learners reason about scientific problems. The learners vary in age and ability, from elementary school children to college students. There are also many differences among the problems that the learners address in these studies. Des
## Abstract This short article is a prΓ©cis of the author's (2005a) abductive theory of scientific method. This theory of method assembles a complex of specific strategies and methods of relevance to psychology that are employed in the detection of empirical phenomena and the subsequent construction