This quantitative study provides a description of current and best practices for authorship determination in studentβ faculty collaborative research. Doctoral students and faculty (__N__ = 1,009) in educationβrelated disciplines indicated how authorship decisions are made in common practice, how aut
β¦ LIBER β¦
Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research
β Scribed by K. Brad Wray
- Book ID
- 116882557
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 123 KB
- Volume
- 37
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0039-3681
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The Authorship Determination Process in
β
Laura E. Welfare; Corrine R. Sackett
π
Article
π
2011
π
American Counseling Association
π
English
β 168 KB
The authorship lottery: An impediment to
β
Petra Kaufmann; Christine Annis; Robert C. Griggs;; the Muscle Study Group Execu
π
Article
π
2010
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 308 KB
Authorship of scientific publications holds great importance for basic and clinical researchers. Academic appointments and promotions, grant funding, and salary support depend to some extent on published recognition through authorship. Peer-recognition and personal satisfaction are additional incent
Scientific research collaboration in Chi
β
Zhang Haiqi; Guo Hong
π
Article
π
1997
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 517 KB
Studies in scientific collaboration Part
β
D. deB Beaver; R. Rosen
π
Article
π
1979
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 797 KB
Scientific collaboration in the field of
β
H. E. Landsberg
π
Article
π
1949
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 68 KB
Funded research, multiple authorship, an
β
A. G. Heffner
π
Article
π
1981
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 414 KB