𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

RUSSELL'S ALTERNATIVE TO THE AXIOM OF CHOICE

✍ Scribed by Norbert Brunner; Paul Howard


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
305 KB
Volume
38
Category
Article
ISSN
0044-3050

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

We prove the independence of some weakenings of the axiom of choice related to the question if the unions of wellorderable families of wellordered sets are wellorderable.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Unions and the axiom of choice
✍ Omar De la Cruz; Eric J. Hall; Paul Howard; Kyriakos Keremedis; Jean E. Rubin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 176 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract We study statements about countable and well‐ordered unions and their relation to each other and to countable and well‐ordered forms of the axiom of choice. Using WO as an abbreviation for β€œwell‐orderable”, here are two typical results: The assertion that every WO family of countable se

Metric spaces and the axiom of choice
✍ Omar De la Cruz; Eric Hall; Paul Howard; Kyriakos Keremedis; Jean E. Rubin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 173 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract We study conditions for a topological space to be metrizable, properties of metrizable spaces, and the role the axiom of choice plays in these matters.

Extending Independent Sets to Bases and
✍ Kyriakos Keremedis πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 363 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract We show that the both assertions β€œin every vector space __B__ over a finite element field every subspace __V__ βŠ† __B__ has a complementary subspace __S__” and β€œfor every family π’œ of disjoint odd sized sets there exists a subfamily β„±={F~j~:j ϡω} with a choice function” together imply the

TWO TOPOLOGICAL EQUIVALENTS OF THE AXIOM
✍ Eric Schechter; E. Schechter πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1992 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 159 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract We show that the Axiom of Choice is equivalent to each of the following statements: (i) A product of closures of subsets of topological spaces is equal to the closure of their product (in the product topology); (ii) A product of complete uniform spaces is complete.