Unions and the axiom of choice
β Scribed by Omar De la Cruz; Eric J. Hall; Paul Howard; Kyriakos Keremedis; Jean E. Rubin
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 176 KB
- Volume
- 54
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0044-3050
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
We study statements about countable and wellβordered unions and their relation to each other and to countable and wellβordered forms of the axiom of choice. Using WO as an abbreviation for βwellβorderableβ, here are two typical results: The assertion that every WO family of countable sets has a WO union does not imply that every countable family of WO sets has a WO union; the axiom of choice for WO families of WO sets does not imply that the countable union of countable sets is WO. (Β© 2008 WILEYβVCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract We study conditions for a topological space to be metrizable, properties of metrizable spaces, and the role the axiom of choice plays in these matters.
We shall investigate certain statements concerning the rigidity of unary functions which have connections with (weak) forms of the axiom of choice.
## Abstract Two theorems are proved: First that the statement βthere exists a field __F__ such that for every vector space over __F__, every generating set contains a basisβ implies the axiom of choice. This generalizes theorems of Halpern, Blass, and Keremedis. Secondly, we prove that the assert
We show that for every well ordered cardinal number m the Tychonoff product 2 m is a compact space without the use of any choice but in Cohen's Second Model 2 R is not compact.