Role of the pathologist in biomaker studies
β Scribed by Edward J. Wilkinson; James B. Hendricks
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 833 KB
- Volume
- 59
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0730-2312
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Cancer chemoprevention is defined as intervention by chemical agents prior to invasion to inhibit or slow the carcinogenic process. Using surrogate endpoint biomarkers in chemoprevention studies may reduce the size, length and cost of clinical prospective randomized trials in high-risk populations. Intermediate biomarkers are measurable alterations in the tissues at risk and include differentiation, genetic composition, biochemical expression, and proliferation. Assessment is possible because invasive epithelial neoplasms are known to begin as intraepithelial proliferations with a spectrum of cellular abnormalities extending to carcinoma in situ. Genetic heterogeneity begins in the intraepithelial phase; a stochastic accumulation of genetic errors characterizes the progression of clonal evolution within the tumor through the process of invasion and metastasis. Pathologic features associated with this process include tumor classification as well as whether it is intraepithelial or invasive. If the process is intraepithelial, the grade and extent of the intraepithelial lesion are reported. If the neoplasm is invasive, tumor size, extent, degree of differentiation (histologic and nuclear grade), mitotic rate, vascular invasion, and lymph node involvement are evaluated. In assessing biomarkers relevant to chemoprevention, and without complete regression of the neoplasm with the chemopreventive agent or agents, measurable parameters along with histopathologic features are applicable. Three methods readily applicable for this purpose that can be applied to paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissue include quantitative pathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular biologic applications. These methods require some consistency in handling and processing the tissues under study; results may deteriorate due to a number of processing variables, including time to fixation, time in fixative, and fixative type. Quantitative pathology, including static image analysis and flow cytometry, can determine total DNA content. Using static image analysis, very small tumors can be studied. In addition, adjacent intraepithelial and invasive components of a tumor may be studied from a single slide. Steroid receptors, oncogenes, and other proteins detectable through immunohistochemical or molecular biologic methods can be quantitated by this technique as well. Cell cycle synthetic function is assayable by both methods. Flow cytometry can calculate the total percentage of cells in S-phase, or the tumor cell S-phase fraction based on the percentage of cells detected between the Go, G, peak and the G, + M peak. A similar approach is generally not applicable with current image analysis equipment; however, cell cycle related proteins such as MIB-1 (Ki-67 associated) can be quantified. Immunohistochemical methods can employ a wide variety of monoclonal antibodies to detect oncogene related proteins, including HER-2/neu (c-erbB-2) and p53. Molecular biologic methods, including in situ hybridization, polymerase chain reaction, and in situ PCR, can have many applications when applied to paraffin-embedded tissues, including detection of viral DNA, identification and measurement of apoptosis, and defining gene deletions. 0 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Human geneticists working on systems for which it is possible to make a strong case for a set of candidate genes face the problem of whether it is necessary to consider the variation in those genes as phased haplotypes, or whether the oneβSNPβatβaβtime approach might perform as well. Th
Voltage-dependent block by MgZ+ of NMDA responses in spinal cord neurones. Nature 309, 261-263. 4.2 MULLER, D. & LYNCH, G. (1989). Does increased transmitter release sustain long-term potentiation. Europ J Neurosci. (Suppl.) (In the press.) 43 NELSON, R. B., ROUTENBERG, A,, HYMAN, H. & F%m"Ncm, K. H
## Abstract In laboratory research, the experimenter's role is to behave in a standardized manner, often following a script, in order to collect data without influencing the responses of subjects. However, in field studies of vulnerable or victimized populations, experimenters confront tasks and di