𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Robustness tests of the augmented Solow model

✍ Scribed by Jonathan R. W. Temple


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
169 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
0883-7252

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


This paper demonstrates some techniques for testing the robustness of cross-section and panel data regressions, and applies them to the inΒ―uential augmented Solow growth model. The paper focuses on robust estimation and analysis of sensitivity to measurement error. In particular, it is shown that estimated technology parameters and convergence rates are highly sensitive to measurement error.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A test of the joint model of causal attr
✍ FRANK VAN OVERWALLE πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 169 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The joint model integrates Mill's methods of difference and agreement for making causal attributions, and introduces a novel type of context attributions which reflect the opposite categories of the standard attribution responses provided in previous covariation research (external versus the person,

A COMPARISON OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS FO
✍ D. W. HOSMER; T. HOSMER; S. LE CESSIE; S. LEMESHOW πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 271 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Recent work has shown that there may be disadvantages in the use of the chi-square-like goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model proposed by Hosmer and Lemeshow that use fixed groups of the estimated probabilities. A particular concern with these grouping strategies based on estimated

Erratum: The likelihood ratio test under
✍ Bruce E. Hansen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 143 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

There was an error in Hansen (1992). I am very grateful to James Hamilton for pointing out the error. Equations ( 2) and (3) in the original read where Q ( a ) is a mean zero Gaussian process with covariance function K(ai, a21 = E(q;(ai)~i(ad). While equation ( 2) is correct, (3) is not. Instead,

The structure of social substitutions: a
✍ Alan P. Fiske; Nick Haslam πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 194 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

People often select a substitute to replace an intended interactant, thereby revealing how they represent their social intentions. Naturally-occurring substitutions preserved the relational model governing the interaction but not the characteristics of individual participants, indicating that social