This book revisits the theory of the sources of international law from the perspective of formalism. It critically analyzes the virtues of formalism, construed as a theory of law ascertainment, as a means of distinguishing between law and non-law. The theory of formalism is re-evaluated against the
Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning
β Scribed by Neil MacCormick
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 302
- Series
- Law, State, and Practical Reason
- Edition
- Repr. 2010
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Is legal reasoning rationally persuasive, working within a discernible structure and using recognisable kinds of arguments? Does it belong to rhetoric in this sense, or to the domain of the merely 'rhetorical' in an adversative sense? Neil MacCormick tackles these questions to provide a comparative analysis of legal reasoning.
β¦ Table of Contents
Institutional theory and the lawmaker's perspective --
The rule of law and the arguable character of law --
On the legal syllogism --
Defending deductivism --
Universals and particulars --
Judging by consequences --
Arguing about interpretation --
Using precedents --
Being reasonable --
Coherence, principles, and analogies --
Legal narratives --
Arguing defeasibly --
Judging mistakenly?
β¦ Subjects
Law -- Methodology;Law -- Philosophy;Rule of law
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This book has a completely original theme, or set of themes. It offers first a new way of analyzing styles of legal reasoning--between more "formal" and more "substantive" styles--that is a major contribution to jurisprudence in its own right. The authors then go on to demonstrate in detail the diff
Theatre of the Rule of Law presents the first sustained critique of global rule of law promotion - an expansive industry at the heart of international development, post-conflict reconstruction and security policy today. While successful in articulating and disseminating an effective global public po
<div>Justice Antonin Scalia (1936β2016) was the single most important figure in the emergence of the βnew originalistβ interpretation of the US Constitution, which sought to anchor the courtβs interpretation of the Constitution to the ordinary meaning of the words at the time of drafting. For Scalia
<p><p>This book explores the development of both the civil law conception of the Legal State and the common law conception of the Rule of Law. It examines the philosophical and historical background of both concepts, as well as the problem of the interrelation between the two doctrines. The book bri