𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Justice Scalia: Rhetoric and the Rule of Law

✍ Scribed by Brian G. Slocum (editor); Francis J. Mootz III (editor)


Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Year
2019
Tongue
English
Leaves
259
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Justice Antonin Scalia (1936–2016) was the single most important figure in the emergence of the β€œnew originalist” interpretation of the US Constitution, which sought to anchor the court’s interpretation of the Constitution to the ordinary meaning of the words at the time of drafting. For Scalia, the meaning of constitutional provisions and statutes was rigidly fixed by their original meanings with little concern for extratextual considerations. While some lauded his uncompromising principles, others argued that such a rigid view of the Constitution both denies and attempts to limit the discretion of judges in ways that damage and distort our system of law.

In this edited collection, leading scholars from law, political science, philosophy, rhetoric, and linguistics look at the ways Scalia framed and stated his arguments. Focusing on rhetorical strategies rather than the logic or validity of Scalia’s legal arguments, the contributors collectively reveal that Scalia enacted his rigidly conservative vision of the law through his rhetorical framing.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Rules of Law and Laws of Ruling : On the
✍ Keebet von Benda-Beckmann and Julia Eckert Franz von Benda-Beckmann πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2009 🌐 English

Offering an anthropological perspective, this volume explores the changing relations between law and governance, examining how changes in the structure of governance affect the relative social significance of law within situations of legal pluralism. The authors argue that there has been a re-regula

Rule of Law, Justice, and Interpretation
✍ Luc B. Tremblay πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› McGill-Queen's University Press 🌐 English

<p>In The Rule of Law, Justice, and Interpretation Luc Tremblay analyses and refutes the positivist legal theory that prevails in Canadian constitutional practice. Using the techniques of critical theory, hermeneutic interpretation, and analytical jurisprudence he shows that the dominant interpretat

Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory o
✍ Neil MacCormick πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› Oxford University Press 🌐 English

Is legal reasoning rationally persuasive, working within a discernible structure and using recognisable kinds of arguments? Does it belong to rhetoric in this sense, or to the domain of the merely 'rhetorical' in an adversative sense? Neil MacCormick tackles these questions to provide a comparativ