Offering an anthropological perspective, this volume explores the changing relations between law and governance, examining how changes in the structure of governance affect the relative social significance of law within situations of legal pluralism. The authors argue that there has been a re-regula
Justice Scalia: Rhetoric and the Rule of Law
β Scribed by Brian G. Slocum (editor); Francis J. Mootz III (editor)
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Year
- 2019
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 259
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
In this edited collection, leading scholars from law, political science, philosophy, rhetoric, and linguistics look at the ways Scalia framed and stated his arguments. Focusing on rhetorical strategies rather than the logic or validity of Scaliaβs legal arguments, the contributors collectively reveal that Scalia enacted his rigidly conservative vision of the law through his rhetorical framing.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
xxvii, 334 pages ; 25 cm
<p>In The Rule of Law, Justice, and Interpretation Luc Tremblay analyses and refutes the positivist legal theory that prevails in Canadian constitutional practice. Using the techniques of critical theory, hermeneutic interpretation, and analytical jurisprudence he shows that the dominant interpretat
Is legal reasoning rationally persuasive, working within a discernible structure and using recognisable kinds of arguments? Does it belong to rhetoric in this sense, or to the domain of the merely 'rhetorical' in an adversative sense? Neil MacCormick tackles these questions to provide a comparativ