𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Results of the three rounds of the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial—The incidence of advanced cancer is decreased by screening

✍ Scribed by Tuomas P. Kilpeläinen; Anssi Auvinen; Liisa Määttänen; Paula Kujala; Mirja Ruutu; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Teuvo L.J. Tammela


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
French
Weight
299 KB
Volume
127
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Screening for prostate cancer (PC) remains a controversial issue despite some new evidence on the mortality benefits of PC screening. We conducted a prospective, randomized screening trial in Finland to investigate whether screening decreases PC incidence. Here, we report the incidence results from three screening rounds during a 12‐year period. Of the 80,144 men enrolled, 31,866 men were randomized to the screening arm (SA) and invited for screening with prostate‐specific antigen test (cut‐off 4.0 ng/ml) every 4 years, while the remaining men formed the control arm (CA) that received no interventions. The mean follow‐up time for PC incidence in both arms was over 9 years. The incidence rate of PC (including screen‐detected and interval cancers as well as cases among nonparticipants) was 9.1 per 1,000 person‐years in the SA and 6.2 in the CA, yielding an incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.4–1.5). The incidence of advanced PC was 1.1 in the SA and 1.5 in the CA, IRR = 0.7 (0.6–0.8) and the difference emerges after 5–6 years of follow‐up. The incidence of localized PC was 7.5 in the SA and 4.6 in the CA, IRR = 1.6 (1.5–1.7). The results from our large population‐based trial indicate that screening for PC decreases the incidence of advanced PC. When compared with the CA, the PC detected in the SA there were substantially more often localized, low‐grade PCs due to overdiagnosis.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Biological aggressiveness of prostate ca
✍ Marita Laurila; Teuvo L.J. Tammela; Anssi Auvinen; Jorma Isola; Tapio Visakorpi; 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 184 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Prostate cancer aggressiveness was evaluated based on pathologic characterization of cases detected in the Finnish prostate cancer screening trial. The trial population consists of 80,458 men aged 55–67 years. A total of 32,000 men were randomized to the screening arm. The remaining 48,

Test sensitivity of prostate-specific an
✍ Anssi Auvinen; Liisa Määttänen; Patrik Finne; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Jussi Aro; Harr 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 77 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract We estimated the sensitivity of serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) as a screening test for prostate cancer in the Finnish randomised, population‐based prostate cancer screening trial. The study population consisted of 80,458 men aged 55–67 years identified from the national populatio

The prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovar
✍ John K. Gohagan; Philip C. Prorok; Barnett S. Kramer; Richard B. Hayes; Joyce E. 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 481 KB 👁 2 views

The two-year pilot phase of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) trial concluded September 29, 1994. The goals, organization, operation, and recruitment status of the trial are discussed. The PLCO trial is a 16year randomized controlled screening trial involving 148,000 male and female

Screening decreases prostate cancer deat
✍ Labrie, Fernand; Candas, Bernard; Dupont, Andr�; Cusan, Lionel; Gomez, Jose-Luis 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 220 KB 👁 2 views

## Background: The 46,193 men aged 45 to 80 years registered in the electoral roll of quebec city and its metropolitan area were randomized in november 1988 between screening and no screening in a study aimed of assessing the impact of prostate cancer screening on cause-specific death. ## Methods:

Detection rates of high-grade prostate c
✍ Theodorus H. van der Kwast; Stefano Ciatto; Paula M. Martikainen; Robert Hoedema 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 137 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Screening for prostate cancer using prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) tests has led to a stage and grade shift as compared to the pre‐PSA era. Effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer should be manifested by a reduction in detection rate of aggressive cancers during subsequent scree

Instrumental variables when evaluating s
✍ Martin W. McIntosh 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 261 KB 👁 3 views

When evaluating the bene"t of detecting cancer by screening we try to answer the question, &what would a screen detected subject's outcome have been if his/her cancer had progressed to clinical detection'. By &outcome' we mean survival time, cancer size and stage, lead time e!ects and more. Because