The prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial of the national cancer institute
โ Scribed by John K. Gohagan; Philip C. Prorok; Barnett S. Kramer; Richard B. Hayes; Joyce E. Cornett
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 481 KB
- Volume
- 75
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The two-year pilot phase of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) trial concluded September 29, 1994. The goals, organization, operation, and recruitment status of the trial are discussed. The PLCO trial is a 16year randomized controlled screening trial involving 148,000 male and female participants. Screening for prostate cancer is by prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. A coordinating center and 10 screening centers located across the United States, a laboratory for prostate specific antigen and CA125 assays, and a biorepository are the primary components of the trial. Scientific direction is provided by National Cancer Institute scientific staff, a steering committee of study investigators, external expert consultants, and a data monitoring panel. Evaluation of the pilot phase is focused on recruitment; screening operations, including quality assurance; compliance; data management; and blood processing. Pilot phase results are anticipated in 1995.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## BACKGROUND. A variety of innovative approaches to the prevention of prostate cancer are now available, including selenium, alpha tocopherol, dietary interventions, and vitamin D. Perhaps the most promising opportunity is based upon considerable evidence that cumulative androgen exposure of the
## Background: The national cancer data base (ncdb) is an information resource and program evaluation tool of the american college of surgeons commission on cancer and the american cancer society that uses a hospital-based cancer reporting system. the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (se
## BACKGROUND. At the current time, there is nearly universal agreement that screening for the early detection of lung carcinoma is not justified. This is based on the fact that, to the author's knowledge, no randomized population trial (RPT) to date has demonstrated a significant reduction in lun