✦ LIBER ✦

Response to the Letter by Drs. Van der Steen and Arcand

✍ Scribed by Hanson, Laura C.; Einterz, Seth F.; Gilliam, Robin; Lin, Feng Chang; McBride, J. Marvin

Book ID: 122515910
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2014
Tongue: English
Weight: 120 KB
Volume: 15
Category: Article
ISSN: 1538-9375
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.03.010

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

RESPONSE LETTER TO VAN DER STEEN ET AL.

✍ Sophie Pautex; François R. Herrmann; Paulette Le Lous; Monia Ghedira; Gilbert B. 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 37 KB

Response to Sloep and Van der Steen

✍ Elisabeth A. Lloyd 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 249 KB

THE SEMANTIC VIEW specifications, Sloep and van der Steen proceed to criticize the semantic view of theories for making overly "tidy" (their term) and "weak" (they use "uninformative" as a synonym) the connections between theories and phenomena. But the semantic view of theories itself says nothing

Response to letter by Dr van Geel

✍ GT Royle 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 38 KB

Response to Drs. Ruifrok and Van der Kog

Response to Drs. Ruifrok and Van der Kogel

✍ J.W. Hopewell; G.J.M.J. van den Aardweg 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 508 KB

Response to the Letter from Dr. van Oss

✍ Miranda K. Adelman; Samuel F. Schluter; John J. Marchalonis 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 61 KB

Response to the letter from Dr van Haeri

Response to the letter from Dr van Haeringen

✍ Ken Hayashi 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 146 KB