✦ LIBER ✦

Response to the authors’ response to Schaller’s comment, “How eloquent is eloquent?”

✍ Scribed by Karl Schaller

Publisher: Springer Vienna
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 52 KB
Volume: 154
Category: Article
ISSN: 0001-6268
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-011-1218-8

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Authors’ response to the Schaller’s comm

Authors’ response to the Schaller’s comment, “How eloquent is eloquent?”

✍ Young-Hoon Kim; June Sic Kim; Chun Kee Chung 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer Vienna 🌐 English ⚖ 56 KB

Response to Garfinkel's comments on ‘How

Response to Garfinkel's comments on ‘How critical is the critical inclination?’

✍ Anthony G. Lubowe 📂 Article 📅 1969 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 37 KB

Author's response to comments on ‘expone

Author's response to comments on ‘exponential smoothing: The state of the art’

✍ E. S. Gardner Jr. 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 119 KB

McKenzie's mention of Brown's contributions to exponential smoothing prompts this question: who invented the methodology? Like many other great ideas in management science, it appears that exponential smoothing was conceived by at least two researchers working independently, in this case Brown and H

Response to the “Comment” by S. Hallbeck

Response to the “Comment” by S. Hallbeck et al.

✍ D.S. McGregor; J.K. Shultis 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 198 KB

Response of the author to comments of F.

Response of the author to comments of F. J. Derbyshire

✍ D.L. Trimm 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 74 KB

To the editor: Following is our response

To the editor: Following is our response to the comments by Tonnet al

✍ Christopher M. Hand; Joseph P. Jordan; Thomas McCormack; Perry Black 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 169 KB