✦ LIBER ✦

Response to J. Zumbro’s Comment on our NIMB paper

✍ Scribed by F. Neri; P.L. Walstrom

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2006
Tongue: English
Weight: 121 KB
Volume: 246
Category: Article
ISSN: 0168-583X
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2005.12.065

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to the comment on our paper by

Response to the comment on our paper by Zh.S. Gevorkian and J. Verhoeven

✍ A.A. Varfolomeev; M.J. van der Wiel; T.V. Yarovoy; D.A. Ovchinnikov 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 73 KB

Comment on “Response to comment on a pap

Comment on “Response to comment on a paper by Sajo”

✍ M.S. Milgram 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 184 KB

Response to “Comment on paper by Sajo”

✍ E. Sajo 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 145 KB

Reply to Dr. Mehl's comment on our paper

Reply to Dr. Mehl's comment on our paper “Electrochemical reduction and hydrogen evolution on germanium electrodes”

✍ R. Memming; G. Neumann 📂 Article 📅 1970 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 57 KB

Response to F. A. Lootsma's Comments on

Response to F. A. Lootsma's Comments on our Paper ‘The European School of MCDA: Emergence, Basic Features and Current Works’

✍ Bernard Roy; Daniel Vanderpooten 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 150 KB 👁 1 views

Response to Dr Nick Barton's comments to

Response to Dr Nick Barton's comments to our paper on deformation modulus of rock masses in Vol. 16, 2001, pp. 115–131

✍ Rajbal Singh; Arild Palmstrom 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 65 KB

In addition to a few comments on details in our paper , Barton raises some fun-damental questions on characterization and classification in rock engineering. He also presents some clarifications of the Q-system, which is highly welcomed. It is important with discussions in the field of rock enginee