✦ LIBER ✦

Response to comments

✍ Scribed by Bernard Sklar

Publisher: Springer
Year: 1972
Tongue: English
Weight: 791 KB
Volume: 3
Category: Article
ISSN: 0826-4805
DOI: 10.1007/bf02145415

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to editorial comments

✍ McLeod, David G. 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB 👁 1 views

Response to Rankin's comments

✍ Gaalen L. Erickson; Jazlin V. Ebenezer 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 16 KB 👁 1 views

Rankin's comments on our article, "Chemistry Students' Conceptions of Solubility: A Phenomenography," are organized around three very different concerns which he has described in somewhat succinct and, we might add, provocative subheadings of: "Nothing New," Two Different Perspectives of Conceptions

Response to Shafer’s comments

✍ Kevin S. Van Horn 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 147 KB

I'd like to thank Professor Shafer for the historical background and additional perspective he has provided. I have only a few comments in response. I will proceed from less to more substantive issues. 1. Use of the word ''plausibility''

Response to Commentators

✍ Wright, Crispin 📂 Fiction 📅 0 🌐 English ⚖ 3 MB

A response to the comments

✍ Harold L. Somers 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 612 KB

Response to Brian O'neill's comments

✍ Thomas W. Planek; Stuart A. Schupack 📂 Article 📅 1974 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 272 KB