✦ LIBER ✦

Response to C. St. John's comment

✍ Scribed by William W. Gerberich

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1975
Tongue: English
Weight: 144 KB
Volume: 7
Category: Article
ISSN: 0013-7944
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(75)90035-1

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Response to Wolpoff's Comment

✍ Charles A. Lockwood; John G. Fleagle 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 36 KB 👁 1 views

Response to Morgan's comment

✍ M. Hirano; M. Aniya 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 44 KB

Response to Chen's comment

✍ Robert W. Finkel 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB

Response to comments by John W. Bugler

✍ Peter J. Smietana Jr. 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 119 KB

Response to Rankin's comments

✍ Gaalen L. Erickson; Jazlin V. Ebenezer 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 16 KB 👁 1 views

Rankin's comments on our article, "Chemistry Students' Conceptions of Solubility: A Phenomenography," are organized around three very different concerns which he has described in somewhat succinct and, we might add, provocative subheadings of: "Nothing New," Two Different Perspectives of Conceptions

Response to Shafer’s comments

✍ Kevin S. Van Horn 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 147 KB

I'd like to thank Professor Shafer for the historical background and additional perspective he has provided. I have only a few comments in response. I will proceed from less to more substantive issues. 1. Use of the word ''plausibility''