Response of a concentrated monoclonal antibody formulation to high shear

✍ Scribed by Jared S. Bee; Jennifer L. Stevenson; Bhavya Mehta; Juraj Svitel; Joey Pollastrini; Robert Platz; Erwin Freund; John F. Carpenter; Theodore W. Randolph

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2009
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 124 KB
• Volume: 103
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0006-3592
• DOI: 10.1002/bit.22336

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

There is concern that shear could cause protein unfolding or aggregation during commercial biopharmaceutical production. In this work we exposed two concentrated immunoglobulin‐G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody (mAb, at >100 mg/mL) formulations to shear rates between 20,000 and 250,000 s^−1^ for between 5 min and 30 ms using a parallel‐plate and capillary rheometer, respectively. The maximum shear and force exposures were far in excess of those expected during normal processing operations (20,000 s^−1^ and 0.06 pN, respectively). We used multiple characterization techniques to determine if there was any detectable aggregation. We found that shear alone did not cause aggregation, but that prolonged exposure to shear in the stainless steel parallel‐plate rheometer caused a very minor reversible aggregation (<0.3%). Additionally, shear did not alter aggregate populations in formulations containing 17% preformed heat‐induced aggregates of a mAb. We calculate that the forces applied to a protein by production shear exposures (<0.06 pN) are small when compared with the 140 pN force expected at the air–water interface or the 20–150 pN forces required to mechanically unfold proteins described in the atomic force microscope (AFM) literature. Therefore, we suggest that in many cases, air‐bubble entrainment, adsorption to solid surfaces (with possible shear synergy), contamination by particulates, or pump cavitation stresses could be much more important causes of aggregation than shear exposure during production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009;103: 936–943. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.