Residual-free bubbles for embedded Dirichlet problems
β Scribed by J.E. Dolbow; L.P. Franca
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 359 KB
- Volume
- 197
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0045-7825
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
We examine a stabilized method employing residual-free bubbles for enforcing Dirichlet constraints on embedded finite element interfaces. In particular, we focus attention on problems where the underlying mesh is not explicitly ''fitted" to the geometry of the interface. The residual-free bubble problem is derived for a simple case and extensions are discussed. We show that under certain conditions, stabilization only requires knowledge of the residual-free bubble on the interface. We then examine methods to approximate the residual-free bubble. A series of benchmark tests are used to demonstrate the accuracy and robustness of the method. Comparisons are made to Nitsche's method employing an eigenvalue estimate for the global stability parameter. Particular emphasis is placed on the accuracy of flux evaluations on the interface. Finally, we employ the method to simulate an evolving interface problem motivated by resin transfer molding.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
We further consider the Galerkin method for advective-diffusive equations in two dimensions. The finite dimensional space employed is of piecewise polynomials enriched with residual-free bubbles (RFB). We show that, in general, this method does not coincide with the SUPG method, unless the piecewise
We consider the Galerkin finite element method for partial differential equations in two dimensions, where the finite-dimensional space used consists of piecewise (isoparametric) polynomials enriched with bubble functions. Writing L for the differential operator, we show that for elliptic convection
The paper deals with the problem of minimizing a free discontinuity functional under Dirichlet boundary conditions. An existence result was known so far for C 1 (β ) boundary data Γ». We show here that the same result holds for Γ» β C 0,Β΅ (β ) if Β΅ > 1 2 and it cannot be extended to cover the case Β΅ =