In this invited reaction, I use the general ideas of theory, research, and practice and two studies (Rouiller and Goldstein, 1993;Tracey, Tannenbaum, and Kavanaugh, 1995) as a foundation from which to discuss Holton, Bates, Seyler, and Carvalho's article. I also discuss briefly factor analysis. ##
Research: Theory and practice
β Scribed by Willis Rodney Whitney
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1931
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 441 KB
- Volume
- 212
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0016-0032
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract A concluding discussion explores the importance of a positive facultyβstudent nexus of responsibility to achieve a successful completion of the dissertation process.
## Abstract Despite the dearth of consistent evidence for conventional feedback mechanisms in clinical practice, the primary methods of feedback for clinicians remain supervision and clinical experience. A new research approach, known as __patientβfocused research__, provides clinicians with direct
## Abstract Think tanks provide a venue for practitioners to reflect on their practice and conduct action research, which ultimately generates new and testable knowledge.