✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to the letter from K. K. Lau and N. M. Delos Santos

✍ Scribed by Masashi Nishida; Hidekazu Kawakatsu; Yasuko Okumura; Kenji Hamaoka

Publisher: Springer
Year: 2006
Tongue: English
Weight: 40 KB
Volume: 21
Category: Article
ISSN: 0931-041X
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-006-0091-9

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to letter to the editor by Francis

Reply to letter to the editor by Francis Y.K. Lau

✍ Ming-Shyan Chern; Delon Wu 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 20 KB 👁 1 views

Reply to the letter from K. Kano and O.

Reply to the letter from K. Kano and O. Arisaka

✍ Cherry F.-N. Ng; Sik-Nin Wong; Hong Kong Childhood Enuresis Study Group 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 53 KB

Reply to the letter from K. Kaneko et al

Reply to the letter from K. Kaneko et al.

✍ Aaron Friedman 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 91 KB

Reply to the letter from N. Akar and M.

Reply to the letter from N. Akar and M. Ekim

✍ A. Sakarcan 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 7 KB

Author's reply to the letter of L. K. Le

Author's reply to the letter of L. K. Lee and D. M. Ruthven

✍ E.U. Schünder 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 102 KB

## Dear Sirs, In their letter, Lee and Ruthven [l] demonstrate that several equations in the papers referred to have been derived by other authors, too. This is necessarily true, b&cause these other authors started from the same physical model, which is called the "unreacted core model". Not only

Reply to the letter from J. Wahlström an

Reply to the letter from J. Wahlström and M. Kyllerman

✍ P. Steinbach 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 44 KB