Author's reply to the letter of L. K. Lee and D. M. Ruthven
✍ Scribed by E.U. Schünder
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1976
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 102 KB
- Volume
- 31
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2509
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Dear Sirs,
In their letter, Lee and Ruthven [l] demonstrate that several equations in the papers referred to have been derived by other authors, too. This is necessarily true, b&cause these other authors started from the same physical model, which is called the "unreacted core model". Not only the authors mentioned by Lee and Ruthven used it, but also other ones, because it is quite common in the field of reaction engineering. The basic equation ( 12) in Part II of our paper, e.g. was already derived by van Meel
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The crux of the objections raised by M. K. Pandya and S. L. Solanki in their discussion seems confined to the authenticity and correctness of our record of stromatolitic structure in the metasediments, intimately associated with Pb-Zn ores, in Dariba mine, Rajasthan. These correspondents, as well as
Dr. Vinogradov points out that propidium iodide (PI) binding data do not always reflect accurate genome size values. PI binding can be influenced by the chromatin conformation. In addition, PI is not DNA specific and pretreatment of samples with RNase can affect the fluorescence intensity in an unpr
We thank Dr. Dalby for his comments. We do not disagree that these ''systemic'' factors may have contributed to the thrombotic complication that occurred to our patient. However, it is our practice to use nonionic media, we do not routinely heparinize our diagnostic cases and many of our patients ar