𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Reply on the comments of M. K. Pandya and S. L. Solanki

✍ Scribed by M. Deb; D. M. Banerjee; A. K. Bhattacharya

Publisher
Springer
Year
1980
Tongue
English
Weight
515 KB
Volume
15
Category
Article
ISSN
0026-4598

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

The crux of the objections raised by M. K. Pandya and S. L. Solanki in their discussion seems confined to the authenticity and correctness of our record of stromatolitic structure in the metasediments, intimately associated with Pb-Zn ores, in Dariba mine, Rajasthan. These correspondents, as well as the field geologists of the Geological Survey of India and Hindustan Zinc Limited, have been working in the Dariba-Rajpura multimetal deposit for several years. Since none of them has so far been able to identify such structures in these metasediments their reactions to our publication are understandable.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Author's reply to the letter of L. K. Le
Author's reply to the letter of L. K. Lee and D. M. Ruthven
✍ E.U. SchΓΌnder πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1976 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 102 KB

## Dear Sirs, In their letter, Lee and Ruthven [l] demonstrate that several equations in the papers referred to have been derived by other authors, too. This is necessarily true, b&cause these other authors started from the same physical model, which is called the "unreacted core model". Not only

Comments on the reply of R.S. Dietz and
Comments on the reply of R.S. Dietz and W.v. Engelhardt
✍ A. R. Crawford πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1979 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 105 KB

The authors state in their third sentence that the paper is 'a new attempt to discredit the reality of meteoritic impact structures on earth ..... '. That this is untrue will be apparent to anyone who reads the first sentence of my second paragraph, in which I say that '. .... the impact hypothesis