✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to the discussion of R.E. Hobbs

✍ Scribed by J.G.A. Croll

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to Stephen E. Fienberg's discussio

✍ J. Durbin 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 43 KB

Reply to discussion by G. I. N. Rozvany

✍ R.E. Melchers 📂 Article 📅 1974 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 188 KB

Reply to the discussion of D. Vandepitte

✍ W.F. Chen; E.M. Lui 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 127 KB

A reply to the discussion by D.W. Hobbs

✍ R.G. Sibbick; C.L. Page 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 100 KB

We thank Dr Hobbs for his interest in our paper (1). In response to the points he has raised, we offer the following comments.

Reply to R.E. Melchers' discussion on ‘n

✍ Van Uu Nguyen 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 136 KB

Author's reply to the discussion by Watk

✍ S. Gopalacharyulu 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 156 KB