✦ LIBER ✦

Author's reply to the discussion by Watkins

✍ Scribed by S. Gopalacharyulu

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1976
Tongue: English
Weight: 156 KB
Volume: 10
Category: Article
ISSN: 0029-5981
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620100217

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Author's reply to the discussion by Trac

Author's reply to the discussion by Tracey

✍ R. S. Barsoum 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 102 KB

Author's reply to the discussion by Brom

Author's reply to the discussion by Bromhead

✍ C. S. Desai 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 61 KB

Author's reply to Steenfelt's1 discussio

Author's reply to Steenfelt's1 discussion

✍ L. Cascini 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 128 KB

Author's reply to a recent discussion

✍ K. K. Gupta 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 66 KB

Authors' reply to the discussion by C. v

Authors' reply to the discussion by C. von Kerczek

✍ P. Friedmann; C. E. Hammond; T.-H. Woo 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 175 KB

Author's reply: To the editor:

✍ Rosenquist, Thomas H. 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 22 KB 👁 1 views

has markedly different reproductive toxic effects in different mammalian species. Having performed these chick embryo studies, what could these authors have done before becoming advocates for their data as a human teratogen? They could have examined the epidemiologic literature and found that there