✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to Ruth Anna Putnam

✍ Scribed by William T. Scott

Book ID: 125554676
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 1972
Tongue: English
Weight: 377 KB
Volume: 81
Category: Article
ISSN: 0026-4423
DOI: 10.2307/2252724

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

In Reply to Putnam

✍ Hickey, Ryan; Mulcahy, Mary; Salem, Riad 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 113 KB

Reply to Ruth Abbey

✍ Jonathan Seglow 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 54 KB

Reply to Drs. Swisher and Putnam

✍ Kawahara, Katsunobu 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 17 KB 👁 2 views

If in our study the mean survival time of patients with more than four positive nodes was longer for patients who underwent three-field dissection (cervical, mediastinal, and perigastric lymphadenectomy) than for patients who underwent two-field dissection (mediastinal and perigastric lymphadenectom

Reply (to Dr Ruth Gawler)

✍ I. E. Haines; R. M. Lowenthal 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 103 KB

A Quick Reply to Putnam's Paradox

✍ Timothy Chambers 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Oxford University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 111 KB

Reply to Ruth Abbey and Fredrick Appel

✍ Mark E. Warren 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 SAGE Publications 🌐 English ⚖ 392 KB