✦ LIBER ✦

In Reply to Putnam

✍ Scribed by Hickey, Ryan; Mulcahy, Mary; Salem, Riad

Book ID: 126548620
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2014
Tongue: English
Weight: 113 KB
Volume: 90
Category: Article
ISSN: 0360-3016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.052

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to Ruth Anna Putnam

✍ William T. Scott 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Oxford University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 377 KB

Reply to Drs. Swisher and Putnam

✍ Kawahara, Katsunobu 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 17 KB 👁 2 views

If in our study the mean survival time of patients with more than four positive nodes was longer for patients who underwent three-field dissection (cervical, mediastinal, and perigastric lymphadenectomy) than for patients who underwent two-field dissection (mediastinal and perigastric lymphadenectom

A Quick Reply to Putnam's Paradox

✍ Timothy Chambers 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Oxford University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 111 KB

Special Issue on Putnam's Philosophy ||

Special Issue on Putnam's Philosophy || What Putnam Should Have Said: An Alternative Reply to Rorty

✍ Carolyn G. Hartz 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 941 KB

Conditionals || Erratum: More on Putnam'

Conditionals || Erratum: More on Putnam's Models: A Reply to Bellotti

📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 102 KB

RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR PUTNAM

✍ WILLIAM H. HYDE 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 175 KB