✦ LIBER ✦

REPLY TO MELINDA JONES

✍ Scribed by ANDREW LOCKYER

Book ID: 110993909
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1981
Tongue: English
Weight: 122 KB
Volume: 29
Category: Article
ISSN: 0032-3217
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1981.tb00511.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to Raya Jones

✍ George Hogenson 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Wiley (Blackwell Publishing) 🌐 English ⚖ 71 KB

Reply to Jones et al

✍ Jones, L D; Robinson, R; Cook, N J 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 47 KB

Reply to Jones and Niederweis

✍ Reddy, P. V.; Puri, R. V.; Chauhan, P.; Kar, R.; Rohilla, A.; Khera,, A.; Tyagi, 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 University of Chicago Press 🌐 English ⚖ 255 KB

Reply to Jones and Mitra

✍ Jack P. Gibbs 📂 Article 📅 1968 🏛 University of North Carolina Press 🌐 English ⚖ 124 KB

The Madogwys: Reply to Dr. Jones

📂 Article 📅 1819 🏛 JSTOR ⚖ 546 KB

Reply to comment by J.C. Jones

✍ Jacques Vandooren; Melvyn C. Branch; Pierre J. Van Tiggelen 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 41 KB

We would like to thank Dr. Jones for his clarification of the burning rate of the two flames presented in our paper. Our conclusion is that he has simply verified the result that was stated in the paper, i.e., that the burning velocity of the CH,/O, flame is higher than the CH,/N,O flame. The differ