✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to comment by J.C. Jones

✍ Scribed by Jacques Vandooren; Melvyn C. Branch; Pierre J. Van Tiggelen

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1995
Tongue: English
Weight: 41 KB
Volume: 101
Category: Article
ISSN: 0010-2180
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(95)90096-9

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

We would like to thank Dr. Jones for his clarification of the burning rate of the two flames presented in our paper. Our conclusion is that he has simply verified the result that was stated in the paper, i.e., that the burning velocity of the CH,/O, flame is higher than the CH,/N,O flame. The differences, if there are any, arise from the interpretation of the term burning velocity. Since both flames are stabilized on the same burner with the same unreacted gas velocity, the two flames obviously have the same burning rate, as was pointed out in Dr. Jones' Comment. However,

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to comment by J. Meyer

✍ J.W. Münch 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 74 KB

Reply to comment by A. J. Chorin

✍ P.G Saffman 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 120 KB

Reply to comment by C. W. Nelson

✍ Herman Krhr 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 207 KB

Authors' reply to comments by J.J.J. Che

Authors' reply to comments by J.J.J. Chen

✍ L.T. Fan; Y.W. Huang; N. Yutani 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 123 KB

Furthermore, von Karman and Tsien (1938) found the formula (LJ = (2J" in "closer agreement with experimental data". More recently, Svoboda and Hartman (1981) and Hartman and Svoboda (1986) have used the following formula in fluidization studies. Il 1.81 x 1O-5 (10) Thus, if either eq. (8) or (9), du

Authors' reply to comments by C. Yao

✍ Richard G. Rice; Duong D. Do 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 72 KB

Author's reply to comments by J.J.J. Che

Author's reply to comments by J.J.J. Chen

✍ W.R. Paterson 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 144 KB