✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to H. C. Howland's Comments

✍ Scribed by K. KAAKINEN

Book ID: 114921065
Publisher: Wiley (Blackwell Publishing)
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 121 KB
Volume: 58
Category: Article
ISSN: 1755-375X
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1980.tb05713.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to H. Stapp's comment

✍ Michael Dickson 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 119 KB

Author's reply to H. Lippmann's comment

✍ D. Durban 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Springer Vienna 🌐 English ⚖ 47 KB

REPLY TO COMMENT BY S. C. GUERREIRO

✍ A. ROY 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 59 KB

REPLY TO COMMENT BY S. C. GUERREIRO

📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 13 KB

A reply to E. C. perry's comments

✍ S Epstein; J Karhu 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 611 KB

Author's reply to comments by H.T. Davis

✍ D Tondeur 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 90 KB

Dear sirs, Kvaslen, Neel and Tondeur in the recent paper, Chem. Engna Sci. d&1191-1204 (1985x have in a footnote on p. t 195 misstated a theorem that I derived several years ago and reoentfy published [Ckm. Engng Common. 41, 267-275 (1986)3. The theorem states that if the matrix A is positive semide