𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

“Reply to Fallin et al.”

✍ Scribed by Daniel J. Schaid


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
55 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


2002] provide convincing evidence that scoring alleles, instead of genotypes, is more powerful for family-based tests of association. Their work was motivated by prior publications that indicated that genotype tests can be more powerful than allele tests when there are only two alleles, particularly for recessive effects [Weinberg et al., 1998;Schaid, 1999]. The main reason for a decrease in power with genotype tests is the increase in degrees of freedom (df). For K alleles, the allele-based test has (KÀ1) df, which is much smaller than the genotypebased test that has K(K+1)/2À1 df, and this discrepancy gets larger as K increases. Fallin et al. [2002] concluded that when there are at least five alleles, the allele-based test is less powerful. However, inspection of their Table II shows that the allele-based test is more powerful for only 3 of their 8 simulation scenarios: scenario 3 (dominant with relative risk of 4) with K 3; scenario 4 (recessive with relative risk of 2) with K 3; and scenario 8 (recessive with relative risk of 9) for K ranging over 2-10. So, except for large risks for a recessive factor, it appears that the genotype test provides greater power than the allele test only when there are three or fewer alleles. These results are in close agreement to those presented in Figure 1 of Cleves et al. [1997]. In that report, the authors had compared the power of the test of marginal homogeneity for the transmitted vs. nontransmitted alleles vs. the test of complete symmetry. If n ij is the number parents that transmit allele i and do not transmit allele j, then the test of marginal homogeneity tests whether n i ¼ n i , which has (KÀ1) df, and the test of complete symmetry tests whether n ij ¼ n ji , which has K(KÀ1)/2 df. Hence, the test for marginal homogeneity is close to the logistic model for alleles, yet the test for complete symmetry has fewer degrees of freedom than the logistic model for genotypes. Even in this situation, the authors found that when there are more than three alleles, the test based on alleles had greater power than the test based on genotypes. So, my interpretation of the results by Fallin et al. [2002] is that the genotype test should be used only when there are 2 or 3 alleles. Furthermore, if there is evidence of a recessive factor with high risk, the genotype test would not be the n


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Reply to Bellivier et al.
✍ Turecki, Gustavo; Rouleau, Guy A.; Joober, Ridha; Mari, Jair; Morgan, Kenneth 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 3 KB 👁 2 views
Reply to Labrie et al.
✍ Alexander, Freda E.; Prescott, Robin J. 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 63 KB 👁 1 views
Reply to Lerma et al.
✍ Lydie Meheus; Ann Union 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 55 KB 👁 1 views

## Letter to the Editor As we are involved in the evaluation of recombinant autoantigens, we have read the article by Lerma et al., "Evaluation of Recombinant Ro/SSA, La/SSB, Sm, and U1 RNP Autoantigens in Clinical Diagnosis" with great interest (1). However, there was one particular conclusion i

Reply to Ceccanti et al.
✍ Janine F. Felix; Marieke F. van Dooren; Merel Klaassens; Wim C.J. Hop; Claudine 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 38 KB
Reply to Naguib et al.
✍ Alvarado, Monica 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 39 KB

## Letter to the Editor Reply to Naguib et al. ## T o the Editor: This is in reply to the letter by Naguib et al. regarding the article "Interstitial Deletion of the Long Arm of Chromosome 3." With regard to the observation of penile enlargement in their patient with an interstitial deletion of

Reply to Fogle et al.
✍ Denis A. Charpin 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 50 KB

Indeed, your paper was published in 2004, prior to ours. As Chaetomium had been demonstrated in only one out of 14 selected dwellings, we do not believe that this could explain why macrocyclic trichothecenes measurements could be so different from one dwelling to another one. Finally, we acknowledge