✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to Ceccanti et al.

✍ Scribed by Janine F. Felix; Marieke F. van Dooren; Merel Klaassens; Wim C.J. Hop; Claudine P. Torfs; Dick Tibboel

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2008
Tongue: English
Weight: 38 KB
Volume: 82
Category: Article
ISSN: 1542-0752
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20486

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to Bellivier et al.

✍ Turecki, Gustavo; Rouleau, Guy A.; Joober, Ridha; Mari, Jair; Morgan, Kenneth 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 3 KB 👁 2 views

Reply to Labrie et al.

✍ Alexander, Freda E.; Prescott, Robin J. 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 63 KB 👁 1 views

Reply to Lerma et al.

✍ Lydie Meheus; Ann Union 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 55 KB 👁 1 views

## Letter to the Editor As we are involved in the evaluation of recombinant autoantigens, we have read the article by Lerma et al., "Evaluation of Recombinant Ro/SSA, La/SSB, Sm, and U1 RNP Autoantigens in Clinical Diagnosis" with great interest (1). However, there was one particular conclusion i

Reply to Naguib et al.

✍ Alvarado, Monica 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 39 KB

## Letter to the Editor Reply to Naguib et al. ## T o the Editor: This is in reply to the letter by Naguib et al. regarding the article "Interstitial Deletion of the Long Arm of Chromosome 3." With regard to the observation of penile enlargement in their patient with an interstitial deletion of

“Reply to Fallin et al.”

✍ Daniel J. Schaid 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 55 KB

2002] provide convincing evidence that scoring alleles, instead of genotypes, is more powerful for family-based tests of association. Their work was motivated by prior publications that indicated that genotype tests can be more powerful than allele tests when there are only two alleles, particularly

Reply to Fogle et al.

✍ Denis A. Charpin 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 50 KB

Indeed, your paper was published in 2004, prior to ours. As Chaetomium had been demonstrated in only one out of 14 selected dwellings, we do not believe that this could explain why macrocyclic trichothecenes measurements could be so different from one dwelling to another one. Finally, we acknowledge