✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to “comments on the quantum theory of valence and bonding: Choosing between alternative definitions”

✍ Scribed by M.A. Natiello; J.A. Medrano

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1984
Tongue: English
Weight: 138 KB
Volume: 110
Category: Article
ISSN: 0009-2614
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(84)85462-7

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

In this Reply IO tbc preceding Commcnr of Mayer. IVC indicate that tbcre is no reason to prefer Maycr's definitions IO ours (or conversely) when in the usual rawe of validity.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comments on the quantum theory of valenc

Comments on the quantum theory of valence and bonding: Choosing between alternative definitions

✍ I. Mayer 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 442 KB

Reply to comment on the paper “An effici

Reply to comment on the paper “An efficient Algorithm for Energy Gradients and Orbital Optimization in Valence Bond Theory”

✍ Wei Wu; Yirong Mo 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 715 KB

## Abstract van Lenthe, Broer, and Rashid made comments on our 2009 paper [Song et al., J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 399] by criticizing that we did not properly reference the work by Broer and Nieuwpoort in 1988 [Broer and Nieuwpoort, Theor. Chim. Acta. 1988, 73, 405], and we favorably compared our