In this Reply IO tbc preceding Commcnr of Mayer. IVC indicate that tbcre is no reason to prefer Maycr's definitions IO ours (or conversely) when in the usual rawe of validity.
Comments on the quantum theory of valence and bonding: Choosing between alternative definitions
β Scribed by I. Mayer
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1984
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 442 KB
- Volume
- 110
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2614
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Ab initio calculation of valence, degree of bonding and arusotropy were Armstrong et aL Some numenal results are given for selected molecules performed according to the detinitlons by
## Abstract van Lenthe, Broer, and Rashid made comments on our 2009 paper [Song et al., J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 399] by criticizing that we did not properly reference the work by Broer and Nieuwpoort in 1988 [Broer and Nieuwpoort, Theor. Chim. Acta. 1988, 73, 405], and we favorably compared our
## Abstract We comment on the paper [Song et al., J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30, 399]. and discuss the efficiency of the orbital optimization and gradient evaluation in the Valence Bond Self Consistent Field (VBSCF) method. We note that Song et al. neglect to properly reference Broer et al., who publis