Category III, the final category applies to those factors that show some promise but do not meet the above criteria.
Renal cell carcinoma : Current prognostic factors
β Scribed by Arnold B. Gelb
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 82 KB
- Volume
- 80
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
BACKGROUND.
Renal cell carcinomas include several distinct entities with a range of biologic and clinical behavior from relatively indolent to extremely aggressive.
Although conventional prognostic factors such as stage and grade are quite useful, other clinical, laboratory, and pathologic findings are now believed to have additional predictive value.
METHODS.
A review of the literature on the evaluation of prognostic factors in general and on the current status of prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma in particular was undertaken. A working classification of prognostic factors, as recommended by the College of American Pathologists, was used. For clarity, the prognostic indicators were grouped according to whether each was a patientrelated or tumor-related factor.
RESULTS.
Patient-related prognostic factors include symptomatic presentation, significant weight loss, poor performance status, anemia, hypercalcemia, elevated alkaline phosphatase and, perhaps, elevated serum ferritin. The most widely used tumor-related prognostic factors include stage, grade, and histologic type. Recently proposed biomarkers still under investigation include DNA content, as well as markers of cellular proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis, among others.
CONCLUSIONS.
Current prognostic factors for renal cell carcinoma yield considerable information for assisting with patient management and predicting clinical outcome. Traditional prognostic factors remain the most valuable, even though a variety of other patient-related and tumor-related factors may significantly contribute to prognostic information. A number of recently described biomarkers show great promise but the current data are insufficient to recommend their use.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Background and objectives: To establish appropriate therapeutic modalities for renal cell carcinoma (rcc), informations on the factors affecting prognosis of patients are essential. for this purpose, multivariate analysis including a large set of variables is necessary. ## Methods: Prognostic
## BACKGROUND. Prostate carcinoma provides a wide spectrum for risk of death from the disease and clinicians have long sought methods to predict the outcome accurately in individual patients. Traditional prognostic factors, such as histologic grade and stage, remain valuable. Additional clinical a
cause they may be impractical, expensive, or unproven. Group II is an intermediate group expected to be available in the near future and Presented at ''Diagnosis and Prognosis of Renal characterized by greater requirements for time, money, and other Cell Carcinoma: 1997 Workshop,'' Rochester, resour
Orthopaedic Serpresence of pathologic fracture, disease free interval, initial presentation with mevice, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard tastasis, solitary versus multiple metastases, and axial versus appendicular metas-Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. tases.
The authors thank S. Ne Β΄grier, M.D., A. Ravaud, M.D., and G. Chvetzoff for providing the clinical charts of patients included in the external data set.