Relative bioavailability of three commercial quinidine dosage forms
β Scribed by Gerard Sirois; Mohammad Eshaque; Michel Chabot
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1980
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 541 KB
- Volume
- 1
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0142-2782
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Bioavailabilities of three quinidine formulations were compared. Two tablets of each dosage form were administered to 12 healthy volunteers according to a repeated Latin square design; plasma levels of unchanged and total drug were determined. Quinidine was absorbed significantly more rapidly from one of the formulations than the other two; the bioavailability of this formulation, calculated from intact drug data, normalized for subject differences, was also significantly greater than that of the other two, 68 and 76 per cent respectively. Individual comparisons of area under the curve (AUC) indicated that estimated relative bioavailability depends on the specificity of the assay, the adjustment of the AUC for the area beyond the last measurable plasma concentration and the normalization of the AUC. The data suggest there is a correlation between dissolution rate and peak plasma concentration.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A comparative bioavailability study was performed using four commercially available, chemically equivalent brands of quinidine sulfate tablets. Two 200-mg tablets were administered to 11 different subjects following a completely randomized crossover design. Serum levels, urinary excretion data, and
## Abstract The bioavailability of quinidine sulfate after oral administration of a commercial sustainedβrelease quinidine tablet was compared with that of oral quinidine sulfate solution in 18 normal subjects. Three hundred milligrammes of each product was administered to each subject in standard