✦ LIBER ✦

Relationships between the Otis, 1960 Stanford-Binet and WISC

✍ Scribed by Betsy Worth Estes

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1965
Tongue: English
Weight: 178 KB
Volume: 21
Category: Article
ISSN: 0021-9762
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(196507)21:3<296::aid-jclp2270210327>3.0.co;2-a

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Relationship between the Stanford-Binet

Relationship between the Stanford-Binet L-M and the goodenough D-A-M

✍ Donald G. Wells; Duilio T. Pedrini 📂 Article 📅 1967 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 402 KB

A practitioner's comparison: The 1972 St

A practitioner's comparison: The 1972 Stanford-Binet and the WISC-R

✍ Paul L. Evans; Bert O. Richmond 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 471 KB

Correlations between the stanford-binet:

Correlations between the stanford-binet: Fourth edition and the WISC-R with a learning disabled population

✍ Leadelle Phelps; M. Christine Bell; Michael J. Scott 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 192 KB 👁 1 views

Relationships between the goodenough dam

Relationships between the goodenough dam and Stanford-Binet in Negro and white public school children

✍ Louis H. Muzekari 📂 Article 📅 1967 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 139 KB 👁 1 views

Relationships between scores on Stanford

Relationships between scores on Stanford-Binet IV and Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence

✍ Howard Carvajal; Kathleen Hardy; Kathy L. Smith; Kenneth A. Weaver 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 144 KB 👁 2 views

A kindergarten class of 9 boys and 11 girls took the 1986 Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Fourth Edition) and the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Of 6 correlations of total scores and subtest pairs, only the correlation of total scores was statistically significant @< .01).

The relationship between the CMAS and WI

The relationship between the CMAS and WISC functioning

✍ A. Jack Hafner; Donald M. Pollie; Irwin Wapner 📂 Article 📅 1960 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 150 KB 👁 2 views

TABLE 1. PERFORMANCE-VERBAL I& DISCREPANCIES\* 104.1 (104.0) 104.0 (97.6) 104.7 (101.1) N. S. (5.41) (.001) 12..1 (15..0) 14..6 (17.3) 13.1 (15.3) 80 -130 (62 -137) 75 -141 (69 -130) 1 77 -134 (64 -135) P> V 46 (72) V > P 52 (28) 1 N. S. ( -) (..001) \_\_ j P e r f o r c e Verbal Total 1 t 1 P \*The