𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Rejoinder: the perils of Viscusi's analyses of smoking risk perceptions

✍ Scribed by Paul Slovic


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
83 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
0894-3257

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Kip Viscusi rejects my critique of his work and restates his view that individuals greatly overestimate the risks from lung cancer and other diseases caused by smoking. But Viscusi's methods are deeply Β―awed and his analyses, arguments, and conclusions are incorrect. First, he neglects to take into account optimism bias, which leads smokers to believe that they personally are at less risk than other smokers. Second, he fails to demonstrate that smokers appreciate the cumulative nature of smoking risks and the power of addiction that makes it extraordinarily dicult for them to stop smoking when their preferences change and they desire to quit. Third, the quantitative judgments of risk that Viscusi relies upon are so highly determined by methodological biases as to be completely unreliable. A substantial body of evidence supports the conclusion, contrary to Viscusi's, that many young people do not adequately appreciate the risks of smoking.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comment: the perils of qualitative smoki
✍ W. Kip Viscusi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 91 KB

Quantitative measures of smoking risks indicate substantial overassessment of these hazards. The qualitative risk measures developed by Slovic have no implications for either the direction or degree of perceptional bias. Qualitative risk questions also suer from the problem that respondents dier in

The risk of coronary heart disease in no
✍ K. Stephen Brown πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 131 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

This article addresses the claim by Gross in this issue that estimates of coronary heart disease deaths due to environmental tobacco smoke are indefensible. Gross's interpretation of his data is questioned on statistical inference grounds. The three new studies which he introduces are discussed and

A meta-analysis of coffee drinking, ciga
✍ Miguel A. HernΓ‘n; Bahi Takkouche; Francisco CaamaΓ±o-Isorna; Juan J. Gestal-Otero πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 120 KB πŸ‘ 3 views

## Abstract We conducted a systematic review to summarize the epidemiological evidence on the association between cigarette smoking, coffee drinking, and the risk of Parkinson's disease. Case–control and cohort studies that reported the relative risk of physician‐confirmed Parkinson's disease by ci

The risk of coronary heart disease in no
✍ K. Stephen Brown πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 85 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

I appreciate the opportunity to respond to Professor Gross, since it seems, from his reply, that several things may not have been clear in my original rejoinder. However, before beginning, it is worth mentioning that another prospective study of CHD and ETS exposure recently appeared (Kawachi et al.

Does an interaction between smoking and
✍ Suzanne L. Tyas; John J. Koval; Linda L. Pederson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 99 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Investigation of the relationship of smoking and drinking to Alzheimer's disease (AD) may advance research on the cause of AD and provide a basis for treatment. Pharmacological mechanisms for an involvement of smoking and drinking are plausible but epidemiologic reports are inconsistent. Evidence of

Parental perceptions of risks with older
✍ Roy McConkey; Marisa Smyth πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 96 KB πŸ‘ 3 views

The majority of school leavers over two years from two special schools for pupils with severe learning disabilities were individually interviewed (N = 34), as were their parents (N = 38). Parental reports stressed the amount of care and supervision required by these young people. They viewed them as