Kip Viscusi rejects my critique of his work and restates his view that individuals greatly overestimate the risks from lung cancer and other diseases caused by smoking. But Viscusi's methods are deeply Β―awed and his analyses, arguments, and conclusions are incorrect. First, he neglects to take into
Comment: the perils of qualitative smoking risk measures
β Scribed by W. Kip Viscusi
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 91 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3257
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Quantitative measures of smoking risks indicate substantial overassessment of these hazards. The qualitative risk measures developed by Slovic have no implications for either the direction or degree of perceptional bias. Qualitative risk questions also suer from the problem that respondents dier in terms of their reference point for what is risky and what agreement with qualitative risk statements implies about their objective risk beliefs. Meaningful objective risk measures imply that people overassess smoking risks.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Lifetime exposures to environmental tobacco smoke from the home or workplace for 88 "never-smoked" female lung cancer patients and 137 "never-smoked" district controls were estimated in Hong Kong to assess the possible causal relationship of passive smoking to lung cancer risk. Relative risks based