## Abstract ## Objective To evaluate the effects of LG100268 (LG268), a synthetic ligand for the nuclear hormone receptor retinoid X receptor, on the expression of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP‐1) and MMP‐13 induced by proinflammatory cytokines in a chondrocyte model. ## Methods SW‐1353 human
Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase gene expression
✍ Scribed by Chunhong Yan; Douglas D. Boyd
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 211 KB
- Volume
- 211
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9541
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The metalloproteinases degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) components and activate growth factors, thereby contributing to physiological events (tissue remodeling in pregnancy, wound healing, angiogenesis) and pathological conditions (cancer, arthritis, periodontitis). The intent of this review is to bring together various studies on transcriptional and post‐transcriptional control of metalloproteinase expression. Certainly, much information is known as to the cis‐elements and corresponding trans‐activators regulating expression of these genes. We discuss the fact that a number of the metalloproteinase promoters share common structural features and, therefore, not surprisingly are co‐regulated in their expression to some extent. More recently, much effort has been devoted to understanding the role of chromatin in regulating gene expression. While this area has been understudied with respect to matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) regulation, the literature indicates a convincing role for both histone modifications and chromatin‐remodeling motors in controlling expression of multiple metalloproteinases. In addition to transcriptional control, mRNA stability and protein translation also contribute to the metalloproteinase product amount. We discuss such studies and how various biological cues, including TGF‐β, regulate the levels of certain collagenases either solely through mRNA stabilization or by jointly targeting transcriptional and post‐transcriptional mechanisms. We also discuss the current deficits in our knowledge, concerning tissue‐specific expression and why despite elevated amounts/activity of trans‐activators targeting MMP promoters in tumor cells, nevertheless, MMP expression is largely restricted to the stromal compartment. Finally, we argue for potential technologies to regulate MMP expression of utility in pathological conditions where these enzymes are aberrantly expressed. J. Cell. Physiol. 211: 19–26, 2007. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract An abundance of literature over the past several years indicates a growing interest in the role of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in normal physiology and in disease pathology. MMPs were originally defined by their ability to degrade the extracellular matrix, but it is now well docume
## Abstract Cardiac fibroblasts (CF) play a key role in orchestrating the structural remodeling of the myocardium in response to injury or stress, in part through direct regulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover. The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of over 25 zinc‐dependent pr
## Abstract Cardiac fibroblasts (CF) play a key role in orchestrating the structural remodeling of the myocardium in response to injury or stress, in part through direct regulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover. The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of over 25 zinc‐dependent pr
## Abstract Reversion‐inducing cysteine‐rich protein with Kazal motifs (RECK), a novel membrane‐anchored matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, have been shown to be associated with prognosis and suppress tumor progression through angiogenesis inhibition in many cancers. In this study, the expression