We describe a cnx system for learning a second language: English. Our purpose here is to devise a practical system that serves educational aims, primarily for the Japanese junior high school students. The system works by generating sentences, using sentential patterns and a set of vocabularies, and
Refutable language learning with a neighbor system
β Scribed by Yasuhito Mukouchi; Masako Sato
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 239 KB
- Volume
- 298
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0304-3975
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
We consider inductive language learning and machine discovery from examples with some errors. In the present paper, the error or incorrectness we consider is the one described uniformly in terms of a distance over strings. Firstly, we introduce a notion of a recursively generable distance over strings, and for a language L, we deΓΏne a k-neighbor language L as a language obtained from L by (i) adding some strings not in L each of which is at most k distant from some string in L and by (ii) deleting some strings in L each of which is at most k distant from some string not in L. Then we deΓΏne a k-neighbor system of a base language class as the collection of k-neighbor languages of languages in the class, and adopt it as a hypothesis space. We give formal deΓΏnitions of k-neighbor (refutable) inferability, and discuss necessary and su cient conditions on such kinds of inference.
Finally, as a concrete class inferable in the sense we introduced, we consider a language class deΓΏnable by elementary formal systems (EFSs for short). As a main result, we show that the language class deΓΏnable by the so-called length-bounded EFSs with at most n axioms is refutable and inferable from complete examples.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract According to Hebb's __cell assembly theory__, the brain has the capability of function localization. On the other hand, it is suggested that in the brain there are three different learning paradigms: supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, which are related deeply to the t
Mattingly (1972) famously proposed that "reading is parasitic on speech." Mattingly was more or less right. In this chapter we propose a broader view: Reading is parasitic on language. It is common to distinguish between four domains of spoken language: phonology, grammar, semantics, and pragmatic