Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant is controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical and histological efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha 2b (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT). We prospectively included 4
Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: On-treatment prediction of response to peginterferon/ribavirin therapy
β Scribed by Ibrahim A. Hanouneh; Charles Miller; Federico Aucejo; Rocio Lopez; Mary Kay Quinn; Nizar N. Zein
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 123 KB
- Volume
- 14
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1527-6465
- DOI
- 10.1002/lt.21312
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Sustained virologic response (SVR) in the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) remains suboptimal. We evaluated efficacy of pegylated interferon alfa (PEG) and ribavirin (RBV) (PEG/RBV) combination therapy in LT recipients with recurrent HCV and predictive values of rapid virological response (RVR) and early virologic response (EVR). Between January 2001 and October 2005, LT recipients with recurrent HCV were intended to be treated for 48 weeks with PEG/RBV combination therapy independent of genotype or virologic response [53 patients (79% genotype 1)]. On-treatment predictor of response at week 4 (RVR) was defined as undetectable HCV RNA, and at week 12 (EVR) as undetectable HCV RNA or a ΟΎ2 log 10 drop from pretreatment viral load. SVR was seen in 19 (35%) patients. Patients with genotype 2/3 were more likely to achieve SVR than those with genotype 1 (87% versus 23%; P Ο 0.001). The highest rate of SVR was seen in patients with RVR [specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) Ο 100%] while the highest rate of treatment failure was seen in those who did not have EVR [sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) Ο 100%]. The NPV of RVR to identify those who will not achieve SVR was also very high (88%). EVR had low PPV (63%) to identify those with SVR. In conclusion, PEG/RBV combination therapy is effective in the treatment of post-LT recurrent HCV. On-treatment virologic monitoring is highly predictive of SVR and may optimize the virologic response and minimize toxicity. Given its high PPV and NPV, RVR appears to be the most appropriate decision time point for continuation of therapy.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Factors associated with sustained virological response (SVR) in patients treated for hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) are unclear. Ninety-nine HCV-positive/hepatitis B surface antigen-negative patients received antiviral treatment (AVT) with interferon/peginterfero
Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) in liver transplant patients is a major cause of graft loss, liver failure, and need for retransplantation. The results available to date with the use of interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) in the treatment of recurrent HCV in liver transplant patients have been disappointi
Sustained virologic response (SVR) after antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients is consistently lower than that achieved in non-LT patients. We evaluated efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy in LT
## Abstract Variation at the ILβ28B locus was recently reported to be a significant predictive factor of viral response to pegylatedβinterferon plus ribavirin combination therapy against chronic hepatitis C. Predictive factors for the effect of therapy, including ILβ28B polymorphism rs8099917 and v