Sustained virologic response (SVR) after antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients is consistently lower than that achieved in non-LT patients. We evaluated efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy in LT
Predictors of sustained virological response after antiviral treatment for hepatitis C recurrence following liver transplantation
✍ Scribed by Matteo Cescon; Gian Luca Grazi; Alessandro Cucchetti; Gaetano Vetrone; Matteo Ravaioli; Giorgio Ercolani; Maria Cristina Morelli; Fabio Piscaglia; Mariarosa Tamè; Antonio Daniele Pinna
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 105 KB
- Volume
- 15
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1527-6465
- DOI
- 10.1002/lt.21760
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Factors associated with sustained virological response (SVR) in patients treated for hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) are unclear. Ninety-nine HCV-positive/hepatitis B surface antigen-negative patients received antiviral treatment (AVT) with interferon/peginterferon plus ribavirin for HCV recurrence after LT. Cyclosporine (CyA) or tacrolimus (TAC) was used as the main immunosuppressor in 37 (37%) and 62 (63%) patients, respectively. Twenty-five patients (25%) achieved an SVR. Twenty-seven donor-related, recipient-related, HCV-related, and immunosuppression-related variables were investigated for their association with SVR. In logistic regression analysis, donor age Ͻ 60 years (odds ratio ϭ 4.45, 95% confidence interval ϭ 1.39-14.19, P ϭ 0.01), viral genotype other than 1 (odds ratio ϭ 4.97, 95% confidence interval ϭ 1.59-15.48, P ϭ 0.006), and the use of CyA during treatment (odds ratio ϭ 6.85, 95% confidence interval ϭ 2.15-21.73, P ϭ 0.001) were predictors of SVR. Patients treated with CyA (SVR rate: 43%) and those treated with TAC (SVR rate: 14%) were comparable for all variables, except for a shorter ischemia time and shorter timing of AVT initiation in the TAC group (P ϭ 0.02 and P ϭ 0.005, respectively) and a greater use of anti-CD25 antibodies, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil in the CyA group (P ϭ 0.03, P Ͻ 0.001, and P ϭ 0.001, respectively). The rate of AVT discontinuation due to side effects was similar between groups (16% versus 8%, P ϭ 0.3). In conclusion, the type of immunosuppression during AVT may predict SVR in patients treated for HCV recurrence after LT.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## H epatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis is currently the leading indication for liver transplantation in Europe and in the United States. 1,2 HCV recurrence after transplantation is almost universal, and 60%-90% of patients will develop lesions of chronic hepatitis C on the graft. 3 The cour
More than 50% of patients with a recurrent posttransplant hepatitis C virus infection fail to respond to antiviral treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interest of a long-term antiviral treatment maintained for more than 48 weeks. Seventy treated patients, with a histological follow-
Sustained virologic response (SVR) in the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) remains suboptimal. We evaluated efficacy of pegylated interferon alfa (PEG) and ribavirin (RBV) (PEG/RBV) combination therapy in LT recipients with recurrent HCV and p
Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressive agent widely used in the management of liver transplant recipients. Cyclosporine has been shown to have antiviral activities against HIV, herpes simplex, and vaccinia viruses. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Cyclosporine in viral clearance in
There are unresolved issues regarding sustained virological response (SVR), tolerance and risk of rejection following antiviral therapy in liver transplantation (LT). The aim of our study was to determine efficacy, rejection risk and factors associated with SVR. HCV-infected LT patients with at leas